Why "electronics duty" isn't one number
Most people come in asking "what's the duty on electronics?" as if it were a single tariff. It isn't, and the gap between the cheapest and most expensive items in this category is the whole story of importing electronics.
The reason is structural. Finished consumer IT products — phones, laptops, tablets — sit under the WTO Information Technology Agreement (ITA), which commits the US and ~80 other members to zero or near-zero tariffs on them. But the ITA covers finished products, not the parts that go into them, and not every accessory. So a smartphone is free; the bare PCB inside it can be 25%; the USB-C cable in the box might be 2.5%. Three items, one shipment, three very different outcomes.
That split is why this page is organized by what the product is and where it comes from, not by a single fake "electronics rate."
The HS chapters that actually show up
If you're classifying electronics for import, you'll live in three chapters of the tariff schedule:
- Chapter 85 — Electrical machinery and equipment. The big one. Phones (8517.12), routers (8517.62), headphones (8518.30), TVs and monitors (8528), PCBs (8534), batteries (8507), chargers and power banks (8543.70).
- Chapter 84 — Nuclear reactors, boilers, machinery. Includes computers and laptops (8471), printers (8471.60), and computer parts (8473). Despite the "machinery" label, this is where most computing hardware lives.
- Chapter 90 — Optical, photographic, medical, measuring. Cameras and camera modules (8525.89 / 9006), measuring and lab instruments (9030–9031), lenses (9002).
The first six digits of any of these codes are harmonized globally. Digits seven through ten are US-specific and they're where your real rate is decided. Two products that look identical can land in different 10-digit codes and owe different duty — which is exactly why "it's all electronics" is the wrong way to estimate.
Duty by product type — the real spread
This is the part that surprises new importers. The rates below are representative of common US HTS subheadings; treat them as a map, not a quote.
Phones, laptops, tablets: usually 0%
Smartphones (8517.12) and portable computers (8471.30) are ITA products and most models enter the US at a 0% MFN rate. The complication isn't the base rate — it's Section 301 if the origin is China (more on that below). For non-China origins, a phone is about as cheap to import, duty-wise, as anything in the book.
Audio, accessories, gadgets: 0–3.5%
Headphones and earbuds (8518.30) typically run 0–2.6%. Chargers, power banks, and miscellaneous devices (8543.70) often sit around 2.5%. Cables, cases, and dongles — the stuff bundled with a "free" device — are frequently classified on their own and can owe more than the device they ride in with. Itemize your packing list by subheading; don't let a broker lump "accessories" into one line.
Bare PCBs and networking gear: the expensive end
Here's the trap. A bare or assembled printed circuit board (8534.00) is not an ITA product. Depending on layer count and material it runs 0–3% MFN — but for China origin it has historically carried the steepest Section 301 surcharges (List 1, 25%). Routers and switches (8517.62) sit in a similar gray zone where exclusions have been on-again, off-again. If your shipment is "mostly boards," check the live USTR exclusion list for your exact code before you quote a customer. The distance between 3% and 28% effective is not academic.
Batteries: classified apart from the device
A lithium-ion pack (8507.60) is its own HTS line, separate from the speaker or laptop it powers. That matters because batteries draw both a duty question and a shipping question — and the shipping question will stop your shipment long before customs ever sees it. See the lithium section below.
Duty by origin country — same product, different bill
Origin used to be simple arithmetic: Section 301 reached Chinese goods and everything else paid MFN. That ended on 24 July 2026, when USTR's forced-labour Section 301 action put a second surcharge on roughly 60 economies. Korean and Japanese electronics no longer clear at zero, and the gap between a Shenzhen board and a Kaohsiung board is thinner than most sourcing models assume.
The layer comes in two shapes. Additive means the percentage is added to the MFN rate: China, Vietnam and Thailand at +12.5%, India, Malaysia, Mexico and the UK at +10%. Fill-to means the total is floored at a number: Korea, Japan and Switzerland at 12.5%, Taiwan and the EU at 10%. On a zero-rated ITA product the two shapes converge — a Vietnamese and a Korean laptop both land at 12.5% — so quote the tier, not the adjective.
- From China: 0–3.5% MFN on most finished goods, plus the China Section 301 list of 7.5–25% where the code appears on it, plus the 12.5% forced-labour layer on top of both. Consumer devices (phones, laptops, tablets, consoles) hold active China-list exclusions in mid-2026, so the list line can be zero — the forced-labour 12.5% is not something an exclusion removes. Estimate it on the China → US Electronics calculator.
- From Korea: KORUS takes most electronics to 0% MFN, and the forced-labour action then fills the total to 12.5%, so a zero-MFN phone still pays duty from the first dollar. Claim the "KR" SPI regardless: it keeps the MFN line at zero and the layer is computed on the same value either way. Run it on the Korea → US Electronics calculator.
- From Japan: ~1.5% average MFN and the same 12.5% fill-to floor as Korea. Auto electronics sit in a different stack — Section 232 on autos and parts does not combine with the forced-labour layer — see the Japan → US Auto Parts page.
- From Taiwan or the EU: the fill-to tier is 10%, a step below Korea and Japan. A zero-rated ITA board from Taiwan pays 10%, not 12.5%. Two and a half points across a container of boards is usually worth more than the freight negotiation.
- From Vietnam or Thailand: additive +12.5% on top of MFN — the same layer as China, minus the China list. That is where the real sourcing difference now sits, not in the layer itself.
- From the UK: there is no US–UK free trade agreement in force, so UK-origin electronics pay MFN plus the additive 10% tier. The China → UK Electronics page flips the direction and shows the UK import side, where VAT, not duty, is the bigger line.
- Intra-EU and EU→UK: If you're moving electronics into the UK or between EU and UK, duty is often low but VAT is the real cost. The Import VAT Guide and EU–UK TCA origin rules explain how to keep the preference.
One nuance worth flagging: "origin" means where the product was substantially transformed, not where it shipped from. A board fabricated in Taiwan, stuffed in China, and boxed in Vietnam is a classification question in its own right — and since all three now sit in the action, the origin test decides which tier you pay rather than whether you pay. Don't take the "Made in" line on the carton as gospel.
Compliance that isn't duty — but will stop the shipment anyway
Duty is the easy part. These are the rules that actually delay electronics at the border, and none of them show up in a duty calculator.
FCC: required for anything that transmits
If the device emits RF — Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cellular — it needs FCC equipment authorization before it clears US customs. Intentional radiators (anything that transmits) need FCC Certification from a recognized lab. Devices that only emit RF as a byproduct can self-declare under Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (SDoC). No authorization, and CBP can detain the whole shipment. The importer of record is on the hook, not the factory — so check the test report yourself and match the model numbers. A report referencing a different model than your invoice is the single most common reason wireless electronics get held.
UL, Prop 65, and the retail fine print
UL listing isn't a CBP requirement, but major US retailers and Amazon categories often won't list a product without it — so for many importers it's effectively mandatory. California's Prop 65 applies if the product contains listed chemicals above threshold; the fix is usually a warning label, not a block, but skipping it invites lawsuits. If you sell direct to US consumers, budget for both.
Lithium batteries: a shipping rule, not a customs rule
If your goods contain lithium cells — and most modern electronics do — they're Class 9 dangerous goods for air freight. You need UN 38.3 test certification per battery model, a proper IATA dangerous-goods declaration, state-of-charge at 30% or below for air, and drop-test-rated packaging. None of this is CBP's concern; it's DOT/IATA, enforced by the airline and forwarder at origin. Miss it and the shipment never gets on the plane, so customs is moot. Sea freight is more lenient on the paperwork but the rules still apply. If batteries are most of your shipment weight, check the per-package caps (roughly 35 kg net for standalone cells, 5 kg packed with equipment) before you book.
The de minimis question — and why 2026 changed it
For years, a single electronics item under $800 entered the US duty-free under Section 321, cleared electronically in hours. That lane closed on 29 August 2025, when the exemption was suspended for every country of origin; the rules no longer depend on origin or product type, because there is no duty-free threshold left to qualify under. If you've built a model on "just keep it under $800," re-read the 2026 de minimis reform and the global threshold guide before you quote landed cost. The US is no longer the outlier it once was — it is now the strictest of the three, with duty from the first dollar while the UK and the EU still work to their £135 and €150 lines.
How to actually estimate your landed cost
The honest workflow, in order:
- Pin the 10-digit HTS code. Guess the chapter, then confirm the subheading. This decides both the rate and whether Section 301 applies.
- Add freight and insurance to the goods value for a CIF figure. CBP uses CIF, not your FOB factory price, and it wants the exchange rate on the export date if you paid in another currency.
- Apply the duty rate (base MFN, plus Section 301 only if China-origin and no exclusion).
- Layer in compliance cost — FCC testing, battery shipping, broker fees — which often exceeds the duty line on a small shipment.
For a fast number, the Landed Cost Calculator does steps 2–3 automatically once you supply the rate, and the Import Duty Calculator handles a single country lane. The US Import Customs Guide walks the full entry process if this is your first formal shipment.
Frequently asked questions
What's the real duty rate on imported electronics?
There isn't one. Finished phones and laptops are typically 0% under the ITA, audio and accessories run 0–3.5%, and bare PCBs and networking gear can reach 25–37.5% for China origin once Section 301 is added. Then the forced-labour layer applies to whatever the total is: +12.5% for China, Vietnam or Thailand, a 12.5% floor for Korea and Japan, a 10% floor for Taiwan and the EU. The rate is set by your 10-digit HTS code and your origin tier, not by the word "electronics." Check both before you trust any single percentage.
Why does a phone pay 12.5% but a circuit board pay 37.5%?
Because of which agreement covers which product. Phones and laptops are ITA products with bound zero tariffs; bare PCBs aren't ITA products and, for China origin, landed on Section 301 List 1 at 25%. The ITA zeroes the base rate but does nothing about Section 301 — and nothing about the 12.5% forced-labour layer either, which is why a zero-rated phone still pays 12.5% and a Chinese board lands at 37.5%. The part inside the device is taxed more than twice as heavily as the finished device.
Do I need FCC certification to import electronics?
Only if the device transmits or emits RF — Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cellular. Those need FCC equipment authorization (Certification for intentional radiators, SDoC for unintentional). Non-RF products like a basic power adapter or a wired keyboard don't. But "no FCC" doesn't mean "no rules": lithium batteries, Prop 65, and retailer UL requirements still apply.
Does shipping from Korea or Japan avoid the China tariffs?
Only the China-specific part. Korean and Japanese goods are outside the China Section 301 lists, so that 7.5–25% surcharge does not apply. But both countries sit in the forced-labour action's fill-to-12.5 tier: KORUS takes Korean electronics to 0% MFN, and the layer then floors the total at 12.5%. Japan is the same, from a ~1.5% MFN base. So the saving versus China is real but bounded — and "origin" still means substantial transformation, not the last port of load.
Is the de minimis still a thing for electronics?
No. Section 321 was suspended on 29 August 2025 for every origin, so there is no sub-$800 duty-free lane left — for electronics or anything else. The old "just keep it under $800" playbook is dead, not narrowed. Re-check the 2026 reform page for the current position.
Who's responsible for compliance — me or the factory?
You are. The importer of record is legally on the hook for FCC authorization, accurate classification, country-of-origin marking, and declared value, even if your supplier provided the test reports. Get the reports from the factory, but verify them yourself — model numbers, recognized lab, current validity. Customs doesn't care that "the supplier said it was certified."